snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810

Snapdragon 865 vs Exynos 990: AnTuTu mostra qual é o melhor chip para linha Galaxy S20 O mesmo acontece sempre desde o snapdragon 835, 845, 855, 865Mas acho interessante ler a matéria Samsung Galaxy S8 v kostce. procesor a RAM: Snapdragon 835, 6 GB (USA a Čína)/ Exynos 8895, 4 GB (Evropa) očekávané ceny: Galaxy S8: 799 euro (21 599 Kč), Galaxy S8+ za 899 euro (24 399 Kč) Aplikace zachytila telefon s označením SM-G955F, které by mělo podle odhadů poukazovat na model S8+. Výsledky jsou celkem impozantní. 1,000点以内の差となり、僅かの差でExynos 9810が優位に立ちました。Snapdragon 845よりもビッグコアとリトルコア双方とも0.1GHz高いのでこの差が生まれたのでしょう。 ちなみにSnapdragon 835のCPU性能は約73,000点なのでかなり進化していることになります。 GPU性能 Snapdragon 845 vs Exynos 9810 vs Kirin 970. مقدمة. معالجات الفئات العليا لعام 2018 لكل من. سامسونج = اكسينوس. كوالكوم = سنابدراقون. هواوي = كيرن. ميدياتك = لم تقدم فئة عليا 2018 بعد. إنتل = لم تقدم فئة عليا 2018 بعد Comparison between Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 and Samsung with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench 4, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. Samsung Exynos 990: 2020 Q1: 7 nm LPP : 8: 8: 1.95: 2.73: 4: 12: 9: 514882: GPU difference between exynos and snapdragon. If based on the specs shown. A S9+ SD performs better than S20 Ultra exynos. 19 | Adreno 540 | Snapdragon 835 | 103.5. 20 | Adreno 619L | Snapdragon 690 | 101.4* 114.8: 108.4%: S20 Ultra Exynos 990: 114.7: 108.3%: S9+ Exynos 9810: 105.9: 100.0%: In the real world, no human is going to notice Vay Tiền Online H5vaytien. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 vs Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Samsung Exynos 9810Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9825 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9825 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung Note 10 line in August 2019. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz up from GHz in the 9820. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. Thanks to higher clock rates, the G76 is now a bit faster compared to the Exynos 9820. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. Due to the slight changes in clock rates, it is very comparable to the older Eynos 9 9820. Maybe in longer load phases, the improved 7nm process helps to maintain clock speeds a bit better. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP with EUV process that should improve power efficiency compared to the Exynos Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998Samsung Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos 9810SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung ExynosSamsung ExynosCodenameKryo 280Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Clock2450 MHz1900 - 2730 MHz 3000 MillionTechnology10 nm7 nm10 nmFeaturesX16 LTE Modem, Adreno 540 GPU, Hexagon DSP, Spectra 180 Camera, Aqstic Audio, IZat Location, Haven SecurityARM Mali-G76MP12 GPU , 2x Samsung Mongoose Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A75, 4x Cortex-A55 LPDDR4x Memory ControllerARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 max GHz, 4x Cortex-A55 max GHz LPDDR4x Memory ControlleriGPUQualcomm Adreno 540 - 710 MHzARM Mali-G76 MP12ARM Mali-G72 MP18ArchitectureARMARMARMAnnounced ManufacturerQualcomm Snapdragon SD 835Samsung Exynos Exynos 9825Samsung Exynos Exynos 9810Series Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9825 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55Samsung Exynos 9810 - GHz8 / 8 Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55BenchmarksCinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31908 avg 32588 median 32588 27% max 33268 Points min 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 3389 avg 3519 median 3519 44% max 3649 Points min 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3498 avg 3622 median 3622 52% max 3746 Points min 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 805 avg 814 median 4% max 822 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2177 avg 2184 median 2184 7% max 2191 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4549 avg 4550 median 4550 47% max 4551 Points min 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10367 avg 10426 median 12% max 10484 Points min 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 2478 avg 2503 median 2503 3% max 2528 ms min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18908 avg 19022 median 18% max 19135 Points min 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 97 avg median 25% max 118 Points min 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 291772 avg 292608 median 292608 100% max 293444 Points min 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 18280 avg 18321 median 56% max 18361 Points min 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 70640 avg 70670 median 87% max 70699 Points min 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 155432 avg 155907 median 155906 48% max 156381 Points min 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 101869 avg 102259 median 102259 63% max 102649 Points min 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 347082 avg 347156 median 347156 61% max 347229 Points min 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 8801 avg 8914 median 8914 58% max 9027 Points min 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 11011 avg 11412 median 11412 57% max 11813 Points min 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 100% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9825 → 163% n=30Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 107% n=30 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average 12. 2221290 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 11485 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11485 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 11485 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 Update 2017-09-11 Home Mobile Exynos and Snapdragon have been neck and neck for years, but according to Geekbench, there's definitely a winner. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption, but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of 250 benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. Device Chipset Model Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 801 SM-G900F Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos 5422 SM-G900H Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 805 SM-G901F Samsung Galaxy S6 Exynos 7420 SM-G920F Samsung Galaxy S7 Exynos 8890 SM-G930L Samsung Galaxy S7 Snapdragon 820 SM-G930A Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895 SM-G950N Samsung Galaxy S8 Snapdragon 835 SM-G950U Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos 9810 SM-G960F Samsung Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 SM-G960U1 Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 SM-G973F Samsung Galaxy S10 Snapdragon 855 SM-G973U Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990 SM-G986B Samsung Galaxy S20 Snapdragon 865 SM-G980F Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 SM-G991N Samsung Galaxy S21 Snapdragon 888 SM-G9910 Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200 SM-S901B Samsung Galaxy S22 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM-S901E About Geekbench Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images, rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics. The final score is weighted according to the designer’s considerations, placing a large emphasis on integer performance 65%, then float performance 30%, and finally, cryptography 5%. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Samsung Galaxy Exynos devices The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. The Exynos 5422 is nowhere near what we would nowadays call a powerhouse, with a measly score of 176 in single-core and an equally weedy score of 322 in multi-core. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S22 with its Exynos 2200 SoC boasts just shy of a 10x improvement in multi-core speeds and a improvement in single-core speeds over the original Exynos 5422 that powered the Galaxy S5. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. The jump from the Exynos 8895 to the 9810 was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. This particular score jump is likely due to the switch from Exynos M2 cores to Exynos M3 cores and an upgrade from Cortex A53 cores to Cortex A55. With an increase in cache size from 2MB to 4MB as well, we would see a decrease in cache miss rates and, in turn, a further improvement in performance as the CPU should be able to fetch more instructions from the cache instead of from the slower main memory. Further generations found a more even footing, with smaller but consistent increases of roughly 20% each time in single and multi-core performance. Samsung Galaxy Snapdragon devices Snapdragon chipsets are the cream of the crop in the Android world, and just like with the above Exynos results, these results show how far Qualcomm has come over the years. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of 156 and 445, respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon 888. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. Instead, it's a relatively smooth and consistent improvement year over year. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon 810 faced. It was the first 64-bit chip from Qualcommm and would overheat quite severely. It was even blamed for why the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P faced major bootlooping problems. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. However, one thing is for sure Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos 2100. Samsung Galaxy Exynos and Snapdragon devices For the wider context of how Snapdragon and Exynos compare across generations, it's clear that they've always been close in performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. In short, these results show the neck-and-neck nature of the chipset performance race and how both Qualcomm and Samsung keep up with each other. Samsung appears to lag behind a little bit, but for the most part, both do quite well and Samsung is never too far behind Qualcomm in terms of its actual performance. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. We're looking forward to the Samsung Galaxy S23 series, and with rumors suggesting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, it's possible that there may not even be an Exynos variant this year. We'll see! VS We compared two 8-core processors Samsung Exynos 9820 with Mali-G76 MP12 graphics and Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Adreno 540. Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench. ReviewDifferencesBenchmarksAnTuTu v9GeekBench 5SpecsComments Review General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators CPU Performance Single and multi-core processor tests Gaming Performance GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan Battery life Efficiency of battery consumption NanoReview Score Overall chip score Key Differences Main differences and advantages of each chip Pros of Samsung Exynos 9820 Announced 2-years laterShows significantly better up to 62% AnTuTu 9 score – 513K vs 316KHas a smaller size transistor 8 versus 10 nm11% higher CPU clock speed 2730 vs 2450 MHzSupports 12% higher memory bandwidth against GB/sBetter instruction set architecture Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Higher GPU frequency ~5% Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios CPU 133777 82968 GPU 178210 105394 Memory 88990 49513 UX 109918 75726 Total score 513831 316666 Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance Image compression Mpixels/s Mpixels/s Face detection images/s images/s Speech recognition words/s words/s Machine learning images/s images/s Camera shooting images/s images/s HTML 5 Mnodes/s Mnodes/s SQLite Krows/s Krows/s 3DMark A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan Metal 3DMark Wild Life Performance Stability 82% 95% Graphics test 19 FPS 6 FPS Score 3228 1165 Specifications Full list of technical specifications of Exynos 9820 and Snapdragon 835 CPU Architecture 2x GHz – Mongoose M42x GHz – Cortex-A754x GHz – Cortex-A55 4x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A734x GHz – Kryo 280 Cortex-A53 Cores 8 8 Frequency 2730 MHz 2450 MHz Instruction set ARMv8-A L1 cache - 128 KB L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB Process 8 nanometers 10 nanometers Transistor count billion 3 billion TDP - 9 W Graphics GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Adreno 540 Architecture Bifrost 3 Adreno 500 GPU frequency 702 MHz 739 MHz Execution units 12 2 Shading units 192 384 FLOPS 607 Gigaflops 567 Gigaflops Vulkan version OpenCL version DirectX version 12 12 Memory Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit Max bandwidth Gbit/s Gbit/s Max size 12 GB 8 GB Multimedia ISP Neural processor NPU Yes Hexagon 682 Storage type UFS UFS UFS Max display resolution 3840 x 2400 3840 x 2160 Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP Video capture 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video playback 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS 4K at 30FPS Video codecs VP9 VP9 Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV Connectivity Modem Exynos 5100 X16 4G support LTE Cat. 20 LTE Cat. 16 5G support Yes No Download speed Up to 2000 Mbps Up to 1000 Mbps Upload speed Up to 316 Mbps Up to 150 Mbps Wi-Fi 6 5 Bluetooth Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS Cast your vote So, which SoC would you choose? Snapdragon 835 18 Total votes 41 Related Comparisons Please give your opinion on the comparison of Snapdragon 835 and Exynos 9820, or ask any questions We compared the performance of processors and found out that Samsung Exynos 9810 is better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 by It has 8 cores at GHz and an ARM Mali-G72 MP GPU versus 8 cores at GHz with Adreno 540. In the Antutu Benchmark test, Samsung Exynos 9810 results were faster than Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 by scoring 401884 points vs 278446 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 2343 points against 1069 , which is higher. It has a lower TDP of 5W 9W for its competitor, which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Samsung Exynos 9810 is better, 200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service. In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you. Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Benchmarks and Rankings Benchmark Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Difference Antutu 401884 278446 Geekbench 2033/681 1711/390 / 3Dmark 2343 1069 Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Gaming Performance Test Gaming test Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Difference PUBG Mobile 59 fps 58 fps PUBG New State 46 fps 48 fps Call of Duty Mobile 57 fps 56 fps Fortnite 28 fps 28 fps - Genshin Impact 37 fps 28 fps Mobile Legends Bang Bang 58 fps 55 fps Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Specification Processor name Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Release Date 1/3/2018 03/22/2017 CPU Architecture 4x Exynos M3 + 4x Cortex-A55 4x Cortex-A73 + 4x Cortex-A53 Number of Cores 8 8 Clock Rate GHz GHz Chip technology 10 nm 10 nm GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP Adreno 540 The highest TDP 5 9 Memory 6 Gb 8 Gb Features Shannon 360 Snapdragon X16 Upload Speed up to 200 Mbps 150 Mbps The Exynos 9810 is the latest flagship Processor that powers the Galaxy S9 and the S9+. From its predecessor Exynos 8895, Samsung has made various improvements. Comparing it with its competitors like Snapdragon 845 and Apple’s A11 Bionic, the Exynos 9810 lags behind in terms of Graphics Performance. However, the CPU performance is much better when compared to Snapdragon 845. A11 Bionic Chip that powers the iPhone 8 and iPhone X is still way ahead of both. So, is this processor good enough? Let’s find out by checking out its benchmarks and real-world performance. But before that, here’s a quick look at the pros. and cons. of this processor. Pros Power Efficient Good For Gaming Unparalled Performance Well Optimized This chip is ultra-efficient as it is manufactured by the 2nd Generation 10nm FinFET Process. Hence, it will consume low battery and the phone is unlikely to overheat. Both the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 and Apple A11 Bionic are manufactured using the same process. Even though the GPU of Exynos 9810 is weaker than its counterparts, it is good enough to handle heavy games at high settings. There are only minor improvements in the GPU performance from the last generation Mali-G71 MP20 to the current Mali-G72 MP18 Graphics Processor. I do hope that Samsung uses a better GPU next time and this is even more important considering that Samsung flagships have a 1440p Resolution Display. The CPU performance is top notch and the best we have ever seen on an Android Device to date. The custom Mongoose M3 cores easily outperform the Kryo 385 cores of Snapdragon 845. Being an in-house chip, it is specifically designed to keep the software and other factors of Galaxy S9 in mind. This results in a better-optimized phone that delivers great user experience. It also enhances the user experience with the help of Deep Learning. Contents1 Snapdragon 626 Specification2 Benchmark Scores3 Exynos 9810 Review4 Comparison with Similar Processors5 Final Advice Snapdragon 626 Specification Name Exynos 9810 Series Exynos 9 Brand Samsung Launched Q1 2018 Fabrication 10nm FinFET LPP CPU Cores 8 Octa-Core Core Configuration 4x Exynos M3 at + 4x Cortex-A55 at GHz GPU Mali-G72 MP18 GPU Frequency 572 MHz Max. Display Resolution 4K Memory LPDDR4X Modem LTE Cat 18 VoLTE Support Yes Fast Charging Yes Camera ISP 24MP Single-Camera or Dual 16MP+16MP Camera The full name of this SOC is Exynos 9 Series 9810 and it is fabricated using the Samsung’s 10nm FinFET LPP Process. It has an Octa-Core CPU with two clusters of Mongoose M3 cores and ARM’s Cortex-A55 CPUs. The M3 are the high-performance CPUs that are clocked at while the Cortex-A55 are power-efficient cores with a clock rate of GHz. This simply means that when you’re doing heavy tasks, the high-performance cores drive the process but during general usage, the low-powered cores drive the applications to conserve battery. This chipset comes with the Mali-G72 MP18 Graphics Processing Unit which has a frequency of 572 MHz. The Mali-G72 MP18 can support a display resolution of 4K. The storage type of this SOC is Universal Flash Storage Coming to Memory, it supports the latest LPDDR4X RAM. However, I’m not sure whether it is a Dual-Channel Memory or the Quad-Channel. It comes with Gigabit LTE Modem that can deliver download speeds up to Gigabits per second and Upload speeds up to 200 Megabits per second. Voice over LTE is supported by this Modem. The Image Sensor Processor supports a 24 Megapixel Single-Camera at max or a Dual Camera of maximum 16 Megapixels each. Benchmark Scores In this section, we will have a look at the benchmark scores of Exynos 9810. Here are the GeekBench, Antutu, and the GFXBench scores of this chip. Note Even though benchmarks give a good idea of the raw performance of a processor and they do matter, we cannot blindly believe these scores. Always give priority to the real-world performance rather than the benchmark tests. GeekBench 4 Score In the Geek Bench Scores, the Exynos 9810 shatters all the records of Android Phones. The Single-Core score of Galaxy S9+ is 3,608 while its Multi-Core score is 8,607. It even defeats the Snapdragon 845 by a huge margin. The Snapdragon 845 failed to cross even 2,500 points in the Single-Core tests. However, the A11 Bionic still dominates Geek Bench with a Single-Core score of over 4,000. So, if you’re an Android fan like me, that’s the best processor you can get for high performance. Antutu Score The Antutu Score takes a lot of factors into consideration but a lot of experts consider it unreliable. The Samsung Galaxy S9+ scored 244,531 points on the Antutu. The Antutu score of Exynos 9810 surpasses any Apple chip ever made. However, the Snapdragon 845 currently dominates Antutu with the latest OnePlus 6 scoring over 275k+ points. GFXBench Score Here’s a comparison of GFXBench Manhattan Offscreen. To make the tests fair, all the phones are tested at 1080p. So, the 1440p display is not the cause of low-score of Exynos 9810. But trust me, that score isn’t too low, it is still on the flagship level. However, it seems like Qualcomm and Apple are surging away with the GPU performance and Samsung still has a long way to go. This test suggests that the Apple and Snapdragon 845 phones will deliver a good gaming experience and this is true. Buying an SDM845 or A11 Bionic will be a better choice for mobile gamers. However, if you like to play a lot of games, you can still opt for the Galaxy S9 and S9+. The games will still run at a very high FPS and the 1440p Display makes the gaming experience even better. So. it all depends on the personal preference Higher FPS v/s Higher Resolution? As we are done with the benchmarks, here’s what I think of this chip and whether it is right for you or not. Performance & User Experience When it comes to performance, the Exynos 9810 is blazingly fast and using the Galaxy S9 feels great in the hands. The applications open super-fast and there’s no lag whatsoever. For performance and good user experience, I’ll highly recommend it. If we compare the app opening speed of Exynos 9810 device with Snapdragon 845 one, the difference will be minimal. However, the Snapdragon 845 has a slight edge as far as the app opening speed is concerned. This suggests that the Memory and Storage Read/Write Speed in 845 is better than that of Exynos 9810. Nevertheless, the Exynos 9810 variants of Galaxy S9 are super-fast and deliver great performance. For general as well as heavy users, it is a great choice. General tasks such as Messaging, Video Calling, and Browsing works flawlessly. Gaming Review The gaming experience on a Galaxy S9 or S9+ is out of the world, thanks to its 1440 x 2960 Super AMOLED Display. Even though the Mali-G72 MP18 is not the best GPU out there, it can handle every game you throw at it. The mobile version of PlayerUnknown’s Battlegrounds PUBG works without any issues. So for all the mobile gamers out there, the gaming experience on the Exynos 9810 is marvelous. Power Efficiency Last year when the 10nm Process first came out, it already did wonders in terms of power efficiency. It is built on a slightly improved version of the same technology. Even though we will see a major change next year with 7nm Technique, this one is already too good for your battery. Also, it generates less heat on heavy usage and allows extended gaming for hours. Ratings Exynos 9810 Comparison with Similar Processors Snapdragon 845 vs Exynos 9810 The Snapdragon 845 has a better GPU but the CPU performance is slightly lower. In overall performance, they are very close to each other and both are great processors. However, Exynos 9810 being an in-house chip, I’ll declare it the winner. Apple A11 Bionic vs Exynos 9810 The A11 Bionic defeats it in almost every test. Be it Gaming, Single-Core CPU Performance, Multi-Core Performance or OS Webview, the A11 Bionic is well optimized and way ahead. Snapdragon 835 vs Exynos 9810 Snapdragon 835 is one generation older than the Exynos 9810 and it is far behind in terms of performance. However, the GPU of Snapdragon 835 is still better. Exynos 8895 vs Exynos 9810 The Exynos 8895 is its predecessor and is weaker than it in terms of almost all aspects that we can think of. Apple A10 Fusion vs Exynos 9810 Even though it is one generation older chip, it is still ahead of Exynos 9810 in almost major aspects such as CPU Performance and Gaming. Kirin 970 vs Exynos 9810 The Kirin 970 has a much weaker CPU and a slightly weaker GPU. It will be good to see how the upcoming Kirin 980 performs. Final Advice Currently, at its price, the Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9+ are a great choice and I’ll prefer it over the Pixel 2 and the iPhone X. However, my opinion is likely to change after the launch of next Pixel and iPhone. Huawei P20 Pro is one such alternative to S9 that you can look at. If we move to a lower budget, the OnePlus 6 becomes the obvious choice. The Mi Mix 2s is a good choice as well. However, I’m more interested in the upcoming Xiaomi Mi 8 than the Mix 2s. Before you buy a phone, go with the one that fulfills all your priorities and not the one which everyone claims to be the “best” in its price range. Apart from the Hardware, you shouldn’t ignore the OS and User Experience. The support for Project Treble in S9 and S9+ means that you can expect faster Android Updates than before. Lastly, I would say that it is a great processor and it will work great for every kind of user. List of Phones with Exynos 9810 Processor Samsung Galaxy S9 Samsung Galaxy S9+ 56 características comparadasQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9810Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 é melhor que Samsung Exynos 9810?Clock do GPU 138MHz mais rápido?710MHzvs572MHzPor que Samsung Exynos 9810 é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835?CPU mais rápida?4 x & 4 x x & 4 x mais rápidos?1200MBits/svs1024MBits/sUtiliza HMP?Carregamento mais rápido?200MBits/svs150MBits/s2 canais de memória a mais?4vs2Resultado do Geekbench 5 de núcleo único mais alto?685vs372Resultado do Geekbench 5 de múltiplos núcleos mais alto?2028vs1461Cache L1 256KB maior?384KBvs128KBAvaliações de usuáriosClassificação geralQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos 98103 Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos Avaliações de usuáriosRecursoInformações geraisUm sistema operacional 32-bit pode suportar, no máximo, 4GB de RAM. Sistemas 64-bit permite mais do que 4GB, proporcionando maior desempenho. Também é possível executar aplicativos uma placa de vídeo integrada, você não precisa comprar uma placa pequenos proporcionam melhor desempenho e menor consumo de energia. Chipsets com um maior número de transistores, componentes semicondutores de dispositivos eletrônicos, oferecem mais poder computacional. Um fator de forma pequeno permite que mais transistores se encaixem em um chip, aumentando, assim, seu unidade de processamento gráfico GPU tem uma velocidade de clock mais DirectX é usado em games, com as versões mais novas suportando gráficos tecnologia sem fio 5G. A rede móvel de quinta geração oferece velocidades mais altas e latência menor do que a rede de quarta geração GPU Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Quando a GPU está rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode aumentar a velocidade para um clock superior a fim de fornecer desempenho OpenGL ES Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810O OpenGL ES é usado para games em dispositivos móveis, tais como smartphones. As versões mais recentes suportam gráficos OpenCL Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Alguns aplicativos usam OpenCL para desfrutar do poder da unidade de processamento de gráficos GPU para computação não gráfica. As versões mais recentes introduzem mais funcionalidade e melhor velocidade da CPU ou processador indica quantos ciclos de processamento podem ser executados por uma CPU a cada segundo, considerando todos os seus núcleos unidades de processamento. Essa velocidade é calculada pela soma da capacidade de cada núcleo – ou, no caso de processadores multinúcleos que empregam diferentes microarquiteturas, de cada grupo de threads resulta em desempenho mais rápido e melhor a tecnologia um chip pode alternar entre dois conjuntos de núcleos de processador, a fim de maximizar o desempenho do aparelho e a duração da bateria. Durante uma partida de jogo, por exemplo, os núcleos mais potentes são utilizados para otimizar a performance, enquanto o ato de checar e-mails aciona núcleos menos potentes para prolongar a duração da Multiprocessamento Heterogêneo HMP - "Heterogenous Multi-Processing" é uma versão mais avançada da tecnologia Nesta configuração, o processador pode utilizar todos os núcleos ao mesmo tempo, ou apenas um núcleo para tarefas de baixa intensidade. Isso pode, respectivamente, fornecer desempenho mais potente ou prolongar a duração da turbo do clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Quando a CPU estiver rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode acelerar a velocidade de clock para oferecer desempenho cache L2 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um cache L1 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um de clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810O multiplicador de clock controla a velocidade da L3 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835Um cache L3 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um suportar memória mais rápida, fornecendo melhor desempenho ao memória DDR Double Data Rate é o tipo mais comum de memória RAM. As versões mais recentes de memória DDR suportam velocidades máximas mais altas e consomem menos quantidade máxima de memória RAM.Esta é a taxa máxima de dados que podem ser lidos ou armazenados na canais de memória aumenta a velocidade de transferência de dados entre a memória e a eMMC Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Um versão mais elevada de eMMC permite interfaces de memória mais rápidos, o que tem um efeito positivo no desempenho do dispositivo. Por exemplo, quando transfere arquivos de seu computador para um armazenamento interno usando código corretor de erros de memória pode detectar e corrigir dados corrompidos. Ele é usado quando é essencial evitar corrupção, tal como em computação científica ou ao se executar um sistema em um chip SoC tem um chip celular LTE integrado. O LTE é capaz de fazer downloads a velocidades mais rápidas do que a antiga tecnologia velocidade de download é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode acessar conteúdo velocidade de upload é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode enviar informações para um servidor ou outro tecnologia integrada no processador para proteger o dispositivo para uso com ferramentas como pagamentos móveis e streaming de vídeo usando gerenciamento de direitos digitais DRM.A tecnologia multithreading como Hyperthreading da Intel ou Multithreading Simultâneo da AMD fornece um maior desempenho dividindo cada um dos núcleos físicos do processador em núcleos virtuais, também conhecidos como threads. Dessa forma, cada núcleo pode executar dois fluxos de instruções ao mesmo bit ajuda a proteger o computador de ataques fornece aceleração para processamento de mídia, tal como escutar AES é usado para acelerar a criptografia e a Floating-Point VFP é usado pelo processador para entregar desempenho aumentado em áreas tais como imagem 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de núcleo único de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de múltiplos núcleos de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023resultado PassMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando múltiplas PassMark único Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando uma única PassMark em overclock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9810Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU enquanto ela está com Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Exibir tudo

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810